Results on Saturday, 18th of January (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 11, 12, 18. Only 7 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 1
- Numbers 2, 38 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- Except for 1 (11), all are even numbers: (2, 12, 18, 32, 38)
- Take a look at: 2, 12, 32. Note how they all have the same last digit, which is 2
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 14 (18 to 32) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are all down compared to the previous ones.
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2014-01-18
Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Sum of numbers | 113 | ↓ | -29.81% |
Sum of digits | 32 | ↓ | -39.62% |
Numbers range | 36 | ↓ | -21.74% |
Evens | 5 | ↑ | 2 |
Odds | 1 | ↓ | -2 |
Repeating Decades | 3+2 | ↑ | 1 |
Repeating last digits | 3+2 | ↑ | 1 |
Hot number | 22 | not drawn | |
Cold number | 29 | not drawn | |
Repeating numbers | 38 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply