Results on Wednesday, 3rd of August (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- All numbers in the results on 2011-08-03 are higher or equal to those in the previous results.
- Look how close to each other these 4 numbers have been: 40, 45, 47, 48. Only 8 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 4
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 14 (26 to 40) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are mixed.
- Numbers 22, 47, 48 from this draw can be found in the previous UK 49s Lunchtime numbers and/or their neighbors.
- Except for 2 (45, 47), all are even numbers: (22, 26, 40, 48)
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 2011-08-03
| Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of numbers | 228 | ↑ | 32.56% |
| Sum of digits | 48 | ↑ | 29.73% |
| Numbers range | 26 | ↓ | -25.71% |
| Evens | 4 | ↑ | 2 |
| Odds | 2 | ↓ | -2 |
| Repeating Decades | 2+4 | ↑ | 2 |
| Repeating last digits | 1 | ↓ | -1 |
| Hot number | 48 | drawn | |
| Cold number | 10 | not drawn | |
| Repeating numbers | 48 | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply