Results on Thursday, 20th of March (Afternoon draw)
Our best prediction for this draw
Notable in these results
- All numbers in the results on 1997-03-20 are lower or equal to those in the previous results.
- Look how close to each other these 3 numbers have been: 1, 2, 5. Only 4 numbers apart and they all share the same decade represented by number 0
- The first 3 statistical factors (Sum of numbers, Sum of digits and Numbers range) are all down compared to the previous ones.
- Except for 2 (2, 20), all are odd numbers: (1, 5, 13, 25)
- The greatest distance between two adjacent numbers in these results is 8 (5 to 13) while the smallest distance is 1 (due to the consecutive numbers)
- None of the numbers in these results are numbers from the previous UK 49s Lunchtime results or their neighbors.
UK 49s Lunchtime statistics for 1997-03-20
Statistical factor | Value | Trend | Change |
---|---|---|---|
Sum of numbers | 66 | ↓ | -69.44% |
Sum of digits | 21 | ↓ | -61.11% |
Numbers range | 24 | ↓ | -17.24% |
Evens | 2 | ↓ | -2 |
Odds | 4 | ↑ | 2 |
Repeating Decades | 3+2 | ⟳ | |
Repeating last digits | 2 | ⟳ | |
Hot number | 47 | not drawn | |
Cold number | 29 | not drawn | |
Repeating numbers | N/A | ⇢ |
Note: Trend column based on the previous results.
Comments, requests & suggestions
New comment
user-6849e9c68eed1 @ 2025-06-11 20:40 GMT | #3390
💬Can you please help with Facebook page I'm trying to follow you but I don't find it
Reply
We no longer have a Facebook page. This is our website, right here and the services have been and will always be here, on this very website.
💬Please send me password Reply
LottoMatic Re @ 2025-06-11 12:58 GMTHello. As a commenter, you don't need a password. You only need a password to access the advanced features.
You can get one at the LottoMatic Membership page
💬That was for the draw that took place on June 11, 2025.Reply
LottoMatic @ 2025-06-11 12:02 GMT | #3381💬Four winning numbers in the first of the 3 random predictions and the other two winning numbers in the second one.
Not too bad...Reply